The article 'To test or not to test? Laboratory support for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis' by Dessau et al. was published on September 5, 2017. It admits something that chronic Lyme patients have known for decades: the current serological tests are invalid. However, instead of relying upon clinical diagnosis because of these poor quality tests, or using many of the more sensitive testing options that are available, the 15 authors rush to draw an odd conclusion: “Let’s limit the use of the very inaccurate tests only to those people who show the few symptoms found under the surveillance case definition for Lyme borreliosis."